White Male Democratic Party Candidate And The Election

I am posting this, because Yahoo.incorporated will probably say I
violated community standards and remove my statement again.
But I am posting this now in anticipation that my message will be
forever lost. I posted this in Yahoogroups Questions feature today:

anthony s
Member since: January 14, 2008
Total points: 107 (Level 1)
Open Question
What about john edwards?

Can a white male still win the white house? in the age of the "MTV" generation people have become brain dead when it comes to who they are voting for President. i have noticed latley that most of my peers are either voting for obama or clinton, not because they know how each of the candidates stand on certain isues. its on the simple fact that these two candidates received the most TV time. it is sickning to me that John Edwards will not become the democat nominee just because he's not black or a woman. people need to stop and realy look at who they are voting for President, beacuse if they dont America will be lead onto the wrong path. we need a President who can help change america for the better, not one that just looks good on TV. Please let me know what you think.Edwards for President 2008

Answers (5):

by toetagme
Member since: June 16, 2007
Total points: 5373 (Level 5)
Contributing In: Law & Ethics

I am voting for Edwards. He wants to bring our troops home, wants corporations to pay their fair share of taxes and has a lot more great ideas. He is highly intelligently, very educated and knowledgeable. Talk about looking good on TV, that man is beautiful. Saw him on Letterman last night and he is very charming, funny and quick witted.


by Bob S
Member since: August 08, 2007
Total points: 1168 (Level 3)

well my wife was going to vote for him because of his nice hair until letterman messed it up for him.


by richard t
Member since: April 05, 2007
Total points: 17007 (Level 6)
I like Edwards,he answers questions........will find out after supertuesday if he is a player......................


by pOrkrOd
Member since: December 09, 2006
Total points: 3779 (Level 4)

I PREDICT 1 YEAR FROM NOW:
John Edwards will be Vice President of the USA
President Clinton will assign a special prosecutor who will bring charges of treason against Dick Cheney
Cheney will flee to Israel
US troops will begin withdrawal from Iraq
Middle class America will begin to dig out of the economic trench that the Bush administration has buried us in
A special prosecutor will begin an investigation of corporate executives who profited illegally from the graft of the Bush administration
You and I will smile again along with millions of other Americans


by Libris FIdelis
Member since: January 07, 2008
Total points: 124 (Level 1)

I do not know how insightful, lucky, or just plain off-the-mark you are in asking your question. Our United States of America is the land of intense propaganda, which the European news media has so aptly pointed out. So most people in our USA are accepting the entertainment story-telling style and campaign advertising propaganda that is presented to our country by both leading parties as news, and our natizens are waving their flags and whooping it up for their "favorate" "candidate". Even National Propaganda Radio (NPR) has gone overboard in blatantly cheerleading the Republican candidates in the caucuses and primaries, while simply ho-hum reporting the Democratic Party candidates and pointing to the "flaws" the broadcasters see in Democratic Party candidates, while utterly ignoring the blatant evil history of the anti-Democracy Republican mafia cult going back to their lobbiest party's beginning.

Before I answer your question, let me first present a background explanation of what is going on.

John Edwards is just like Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. During the beginning and middle of last year, Edwards talked differently than he does now, just like Hillary and Barack did, except, Barack is a consumate liar, which is recorded in the newspaper archives, always twisting and turning and contradicting in the same way as George W. Bush and staff.

The three of the surviving Democratic candidates have made statements that have been favorable to the Republican mafia cult platform, right up until the Iowa Caucus, although Edwards has more directly assailed the corporate power and wealth conspiracy to own and control our nation exclusive of Democracy (always spelled respectfully with a capital "D"). The other two Democratic candidates are "just" being opposed. But do not be fooled by Edwards, pay attention to what he mis-stated (or rather confessed to promoting) during the beginning and middle of last year when campaigning began. You will then see his whimpy stand.

The only three Democratic Party candidates who talked like genuine liberal Democrats were Kucinich, Biden and Dodd, but all of them are no longer in the running as presidential contenders, because Dumb-o-crats are too Republican mafia cult - brainwashed or oriented mentally these days.

Anyone who would believe Obama shows their lack of mental function, he is from The Establishment and he is there excactly as John Kerry was there: to split the Democratic Party votes so that the Republicommunists can win the White House... AGAIN. Obama is not running for president, and either was Kerry (the Skull and Bones member just like both Bush's!)

Hillary is genuinely running for president, and she will be immensely more beneficial to our nation than the best Republican president of the past. I really doubt that she will ever be another John Kennedy, but that trait may keep her alive, keep her from being assassinated by The Establishment. However, Hillary and William Clinton together are smarter than all of the Republican elected mafia combined, so she only stands to fail if the women in our nation continue their female prejudice to not vote for another smart woman running for any office. That fact comes out of a League of Women Voters survey. On the other hand, one can not really know what kind of president Hillary Clinton would or will make by her past record, there are too many variables.

Yes, a white male candidate is always more attractive to voters than a "minority" or female candidate. George W. Bush documented life-long criminal record shows how people regard a liar white male figurehead who violates international laws to start an illegal war against a non-warring nation, and I have not violated any community standards by telling the truth. Therefore, any white male has an advantage to become US President, for our nation has no standards of propriety or of justice and honor in screening candidates for president, let alone for the documented misbehavior of the election system in officializing a president for office. The question you raise is called "reverse discrimination", or, "How dare you not vote for a minority candidate over an Establishment candidate". Had Collin Powell been an honest man who had not sold his country down the river for the Republican mafia cult, he would have been the ideal African American president; had Barack Obama been wise and truly wanted to be a US President, he would have campaigned for Hillary Clinton to be her vice president, and after Hillary's two terms in office as our nation's first female President, Barack would have been a shoo-in as our nation's first African-American vice president to be our nation's first African American President for another two terms. Unfortunately, Obama's loyalty to The Establishment to run for office only to split Democratic Party votes so no Democrat can win has eliminated his chance to go into history as a successful politician. Instead, he will be forgotten.

Does that answer your question? Unless Democrats wake up and start using their brains, look for another Republicommunist President (possibly McCain) for the next four years. And I am not kidding.